![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgMizxIWUmruvw-H8uX7PYSbJtnxzZL5QAmmTqMgIXJPsemW6sMyWFVkY2a6M2ANUppRE0d1AYJheGXMQW1B-B9kRgIurkDc9izcJpGlRVDFad4uDvJ6585Pv7mCxzQwMdIas8iw9T_hlM/s320/untitled2.jpg)
Friday, 30 October 2009
Thursday, 29 October 2009
Reception
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtRjqkPZGuRPAjfQ-aG5GnW3SDgUDYHbinmNE80U9zRH8p9vcD9BRZ5IP8gHk1tVmxL22GpeLSIolloITJwnF5CH9sIY350Lmtktam0fVQAtOkudPThW2L9Wa4iZS1zIotYtnO7mUkYxI/s320/Stuarthall.jpg)
- this considered how texts wew encoded with meaning by producers and then (understood) by audiences
-it suggests:
. when the producer constructs a text it is encoded with a meaning or message that the producer wishes to convey to the audiences
.in some instances audiences will correctly decode the message or meaning and understand what the producer was trying to say
.in some instances the audiences with either reject or fail to correctly understand the message
- Sturat Hall identified three types of audience readings (or decoding) of the text:
1) Dominant
2) Negotiated
3) Oppositional
Dominant
.where audience decodes the message as the producer of the texts wants them to do and broady agrees with it
.eg watching a political speech and agreeing with it
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEin5jBaESau3kTUupLmOOiTdc9rO4HZmIq_wS9QOvUVcV7XHpTH_58gUvqo58zWcqpgjn9iYOu2l12WQyQ-awzWwD9vPwyoZ5jpXnXf_LAuoVLbqnkO7cVTg1R6y3e-dl_Z94I_4v885Uc/s320/imagesCA13MRBD.jpg)
Negotiated
.audience accepts, rejects or refines elements of the text in light of previously held views
. eg niether agreeing or disagreeing with a political speech or being disinterested
Opposited
. the dominant meaning is recognised but rejected for cultural political or ideological reasons
.eg total rejection of the political speech and active opposition
Monday, 26 October 2009
Gratifications model
- the audience is active
-the audience uses the text amd is Not used by it
-the audience uses the text for its own gratification or pleasure
- here power lies with the audience not the producers
-this theory emphasises what audience do with media texts, how and why they use them.
- far from being duped by the media the audience is free to reject, use or play with media meanings as they see fit
- audiences therefore use media texts to gratify needs for:
Diversion
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBIYobagouoxNSuXoWToith-uSmcs1kdUgPu_ijGU1UJzR0oFkYeMib0dGve-cicI9sCf3u7Kmg-jGv5-wKuC5uqufRI4RBO2khGx5RTi_e-weQJ2Qiw5qKC0TxESpki_-1FFGQ_Dsa8k/s320/imagesCA2DWF7T.jpg)
escapism
information
pleasure
comparing relationships and lifesyles with ones own
sexual stimulation.
- the audience is in control and consumption of the media helps people with issues such as :
Learning
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEha0XpNGwricLnJJx388gDR3kk0CmH1oxzbLMnxVjWwW_2RBnI20bl3O0Bl62BKWjSyEvd672ujFeeaSlI4AkPF-qya4kwAHNpuFBkmAXglxleIWFLvP1keTvzSEjh5BPluAAs2JHc4iRo/s320/imagesCAANINB9.jpg)
emotional satisfaction
relaxation
help with issues of personal identity
help with issues of social identity
help with issues of aggression and violence
- Controversially the theory suggest the consumption of violent images can be helpful rather than harmful
-the theroy suggest that audiences act out their violent impulses through the consumption of media violence
- the audience inclination towards violent is therefore sublimimatedand they vare less likely to commit a violent act
Thursday, 22 October 2009
Friday, 16 October 2009
Audience theroy continued
-sunsequently in each case it was found that no case could be proven to demonstrate a link between the text and violent acts
- the effects model contributes to moral panics whereby:
.the media produce inactivity, make us into students who want to pass their exams or "couch potatoes" who make no effort to get a job
.the media produces violent "copycat" behaviour or mindless shopping in response to advertisements
- it is still unclear that there is any link between the consumption of violent media texts and violent imitative behaviour
- it is also clear the theory is flawed in that many people do watch violent text and appear not to be influence
- therefore a new theroy is necessary:
USE OF GRATIFICATIONS MODEL
Thursday, 15 October 2009
Hypodermic model- continued
. the Frankfurt school theorised in the 1920s and 30s that the mass media acted to restrict and control audiences to the benefit of corporate capitalismand government
took their ideas from the German Nazis, propaganda
. The bebo doll experiment. This is a very controversial piece of research that apparently proved that children copy violent behaviour, 1960s
Children are shown a video of a man hitting a doll. Taken to a room full of dolls and they start hitting the dolls
Conducted in 1961 by Albert Bandura- here is what he did
. watched a videa were a man violently attacked a clown toy called the bebo toy
. the children were taken to a room with attractive toys that they were not allowed to touch
. they were led to another room with bobo dolls
.88% of the children imitated the violent behaviour that they had earlier viewed. 8 months later 40% of the children reproduced the same violent behaviour
. conclusion reached was that children will imitate violent media content
- there are many problems with the experiment. What do you think are the flaws with the methodology? Does it indeed prove that children imitate violent media content?
- The effects model (backed up by the bobo doll experiment) is still the dominant theory used by politicians, some parts of the media and some religious organisations in attributing violence to the consumption of media texts
- Key example sited ascauseing or being contributory factors are:
. the film childs play 3 in the murder of James Bulger in 1993
. the game manhunt in the murder of Stefan Pakeerah in 2004 by his friend Warren Leblane
. the film a clockwork orange(1971) in a number of rapes and violent attacks
. the film severance(2006) in the murder if simon Everitt
. In each case there was a media and political outcry for the texts to be banned
Thursday, 8 October 2009
lyrics to our song
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghIA9N8ZVP6mETV9utZA4bqccPM83SibP_HygZjxYxg99Tzx1pCHRyZAJ7zIC8l3pRaFQSLkGlYzZeMNzSb0tQY_Ho4b8gTcU_eEnqHkjBTeD6XOqHDa5Bv9jltklCIPDgyuARPkds1pc/s320/imagesCAYT5240.jpg)
And we were all insomniacs
Making attacks unto ourselves
Expecting someone to take notice
Make this all disappear
And maybe they will say to you
"Today will be your day"
Perchance to take you someplace
Where pain's just a bad dream
Could you imagine where you'd be
If you hadn't been where you have been?
Promises they couldn't keep
Do you know what i mean?
Superficial love refueling
Was what you had got
Now I'm here to give you
What you need and what you want
Take a second look at yourself
Tell me what you see
Cause if it ain't the same pretty girl I see
Your eyes don't see what I see
So hold on, hold on
Hold on, hold on
And we were all insomniacs
Making attacks unto ourselves
Expecting someone to take notice
Make this all disappear
And maybe they will say to you
"Today will be your day"
Perchance to take you some place
Where pain's just a bad dream
Take a second look at yourself
Tell me what you see
Cause if it ain't the same pretty girl I see
Your eyes don't see what I see
So hold on, hold on
Hold on, hold on
`
Take a second look at yourself
Tell me what you see
Cause if it ain't the same pretty girl
I seeYour eyes don't see what I see
Hold on, hold onto me yeah
Monday, 5 October 2009
The effects model/ Hypodermic model
The first one is the effects model or Hypodermic model.
The effects model
- consumption of media texts has an effect or uinfluence upon the audience
- it is normally considered that this effect is negative
-Adiences are passive and powerless to prevent the influence
- the power lies with the message of the text
- it is also called the Hypodermid model
-key evidence is
1)the Frankfurt school- in the 1920s and 1930s that the mass media acted to restrict and control audiences to the beneifit of corporate capitalism and government. (Big business).
conducted in 1961 by Albert Bandura
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjYWlFc6qUmYsuoBzOfuB5rif0S58meZUJcUjjwWkxGPI9K4rKVMA-ccegckMu6H20FwWHt2IMbS99c_t6OqBcTXi9H9RjctRGLkoIuQgRulx37YADgLTHSsPaRKfmw0Vxa7T496zt7i-Y/s320/imagesCAV3FOLB.jpg)
In this experiement:
- children watched a video where an adult violently attacked a clown toy called a bobo doll
- children were then taken to a room with attractive toys and told not to touch them
- they were lead to another room with bobo dolls
-88% of them imitaed the violent behaviour that they had earlier viewed. 8 months later 40% of the children produced that same violent behaviour.
- conclusion reached was that children will imitate violent media content
- there are many problems with the experiment. What do you think are the flaws with the methidology? Does it indeed prove that children imitate violent media content.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfZ64f17iRgxAhAb-_a9fo4YAzImlImw9-wzkFQh66raeA5HsJLGVCdC6PkAAhrENpaePO7XpzbzVtqKyoNrqOuDDjVlcEKlUEMUY7mi2ZylR3g_jxHKcsEkSjgOjWhddLmazeEl3vIVA/s320/imagesCAU4XX4D.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXc84NY8o9a-1eVQ76c83dC3W1lyHIuxfuJDa78Jp9chZKmJQSpQQTU5tDI82cP6h_O_VWUbEcK3NuHZgYWHcDr49FRatq4LthAobCRfaz93O_CkduEU2e27z858MVMDbJ-BtUQzAvK9s/s320/imagesCA0FGO83.jpg)
Hypodermid model
- the messages in media texts are injected into the audience by the powerful, syringe- like, media
-audience is powerless to resist
-therefore, the media works like a drug and the audience is drugged, addicted, doped, duped
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLnPllvVnZYLQaLvR_O0lAlE6nlhH6BY14x4RPd6ugXUkgDG6k-pY-VGINEsxs_5jc-7GncT_5iPWpo7EtuEnoI3UW73d31K-WMYlWr-5kC1LApA5cPTz_BJTf7kMZleWS5bmX1oE8Kyw/s320/images.jpg)
Friday, 2 October 2009
Audience theroy
Why do we consume the media texts that we do?
A model of the media, is a method of considering how the media functions.
At the moment i am having difficulities getting the diagram of the theory up on the blog. So i will describe how it works.
First you have texts, such has magazines, tv and radio, which us the adience consumes. The questions surrounding us is why we watch or listern or read it, what are we consuming, how do we consume and who is the audience the are targeting. When we watch films at the cinema, or buying cds and films, we are paying for them. So a finance transation will be between us the audience and the instiutuation, such as itv, sony, and waner bothers. Whioch they money they recieve will go towards production of new videos and films.
But at the moment the instituations arent getting that money they need because of priate copys of films and illegal downloading.While this is cheaper for us, in the long run it will affect us. This is because if they arent getting any money they wont be able to produce new films ect. Which means we will miss out on them.