There are three theroies of audience that we cqan apply to help us come to a better understanding about the relationship between texts and audience.
The first one is the effects model or Hypodermic model.
The effects model
- consumption of media texts has an effect or uinfluence upon the audience
- it is normally considered that this effect is negative
-Adiences are passive and powerless to prevent the influence
- the power lies with the message of the text
- it is also called the Hypodermid model
-key evidence is
1)the Frankfurt school- in the 1920s and 1930s that the mass media acted to restrict and control audiences to the beneifit of corporate capitalism and government. (Big business).
The first one is the effects model or Hypodermic model.
The effects model
- consumption of media texts has an effect or uinfluence upon the audience
- it is normally considered that this effect is negative
-Adiences are passive and powerless to prevent the influence
- the power lies with the message of the text
- it is also called the Hypodermid model
-key evidence is
1)the Frankfurt school- in the 1920s and 1930s that the mass media acted to restrict and control audiences to the beneifit of corporate capitalism and government. (Big business).
2) The bobo doll experiment- is a very controvestial piece of research that apparently proved that children copy violent behaviour
conducted in 1961 by Albert Bandura
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjYWlFc6qUmYsuoBzOfuB5rif0S58meZUJcUjjwWkxGPI9K4rKVMA-ccegckMu6H20FwWHt2IMbS99c_t6OqBcTXi9H9RjctRGLkoIuQgRulx37YADgLTHSsPaRKfmw0Vxa7T496zt7i-Y/s320/imagesCAV3FOLB.jpg)
In this experiement:
- children watched a video where an adult violently attacked a clown toy called a bobo doll
- children were then taken to a room with attractive toys and told not to touch them
- they were lead to another room with bobo dolls
-88% of them imitaed the violent behaviour that they had earlier viewed. 8 months later 40% of the children produced that same violent behaviour.
- conclusion reached was that children will imitate violent media content
- there are many problems with the experiment. What do you think are the flaws with the methidology? Does it indeed prove that children imitate violent media content.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfZ64f17iRgxAhAb-_a9fo4YAzImlImw9-wzkFQh66raeA5HsJLGVCdC6PkAAhrENpaePO7XpzbzVtqKyoNrqOuDDjVlcEKlUEMUY7mi2ZylR3g_jxHKcsEkSjgOjWhddLmazeEl3vIVA/s320/imagesCAU4XX4D.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXc84NY8o9a-1eVQ76c83dC3W1lyHIuxfuJDa78Jp9chZKmJQSpQQTU5tDI82cP6h_O_VWUbEcK3NuHZgYWHcDr49FRatq4LthAobCRfaz93O_CkduEU2e27z858MVMDbJ-BtUQzAvK9s/s320/imagesCA0FGO83.jpg)
Hypodermid model
- the messages in media texts are injected into the audience by the powerful, syringe- like, media
-audience is powerless to resist
-therefore, the media works like a drug and the audience is drugged, addicted, doped, duped![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLnPllvVnZYLQaLvR_O0lAlE6nlhH6BY14x4RPd6ugXUkgDG6k-pY-VGINEsxs_5jc-7GncT_5iPWpo7EtuEnoI3UW73d31K-WMYlWr-5kC1LApA5cPTz_BJTf7kMZleWS5bmX1oE8Kyw/s320/images.jpg)
conducted in 1961 by Albert Bandura
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjYWlFc6qUmYsuoBzOfuB5rif0S58meZUJcUjjwWkxGPI9K4rKVMA-ccegckMu6H20FwWHt2IMbS99c_t6OqBcTXi9H9RjctRGLkoIuQgRulx37YADgLTHSsPaRKfmw0Vxa7T496zt7i-Y/s320/imagesCAV3FOLB.jpg)
In this experiement:
- children watched a video where an adult violently attacked a clown toy called a bobo doll
- children were then taken to a room with attractive toys and told not to touch them
- they were lead to another room with bobo dolls
-88% of them imitaed the violent behaviour that they had earlier viewed. 8 months later 40% of the children produced that same violent behaviour.
- conclusion reached was that children will imitate violent media content
- there are many problems with the experiment. What do you think are the flaws with the methidology? Does it indeed prove that children imitate violent media content.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfZ64f17iRgxAhAb-_a9fo4YAzImlImw9-wzkFQh66raeA5HsJLGVCdC6PkAAhrENpaePO7XpzbzVtqKyoNrqOuDDjVlcEKlUEMUY7mi2ZylR3g_jxHKcsEkSjgOjWhddLmazeEl3vIVA/s320/imagesCAU4XX4D.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXc84NY8o9a-1eVQ76c83dC3W1lyHIuxfuJDa78Jp9chZKmJQSpQQTU5tDI82cP6h_O_VWUbEcK3NuHZgYWHcDr49FRatq4LthAobCRfaz93O_CkduEU2e27z858MVMDbJ-BtUQzAvK9s/s320/imagesCA0FGO83.jpg)
Hypodermid model
- the messages in media texts are injected into the audience by the powerful, syringe- like, media
-audience is powerless to resist
-therefore, the media works like a drug and the audience is drugged, addicted, doped, duped
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLnPllvVnZYLQaLvR_O0lAlE6nlhH6BY14x4RPd6ugXUkgDG6k-pY-VGINEsxs_5jc-7GncT_5iPWpo7EtuEnoI3UW73d31K-WMYlWr-5kC1LApA5cPTz_BJTf7kMZleWS5bmX1oE8Kyw/s320/images.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment